yourstate.us

Vermont

VT · 1 congressional seat · 2 Senate seats · Federal money in Vermont

Get this as JSON

Vermont by congressional district

Vermont broken into its seats. Click a district to open its own page, where every figure below is measured against the boundaries in force when it was published.

District lines may not be completely accurate. To find out which district your city resides in, please see:Who Represents Me?

Hover a district for its representative; click to open it. Vermont, 119th Congress.

Colour shows the party of the sitting member, not the value — the figure and its trend are in the hover card. US Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020-2024. A change since a member took office is not evidence that they caused it. City points and populations: U.S. Census Bureau (Gazetteer 2025, population estimates 2025, ACS 2020–2024).

Current senator

Bernard Sanders

Independent · holding this seat since 2007

Recorded votes

Yea 8,755Nay 5,941

of 15,980 roll calls across their career.

Government experience

  • Senate · VT2025–2031
  • Senate · VT2019–2025
  • Senate · VT2013–2019
  • Senate · VT2007–2013
  • House · VT2005–2007
  • House · VT2003–2005
  • House · VT2001–2003
  • House · VT1999–2001
  • House · VT1997–1999
  • House · VT1995–1997
  • House · VT1993–1995
  • House · VT1991–1993

Where their votes land

Democratic side0 · Voted with Democrats almost every timeRepublican side
  • Average Senate Democrat: 2
  • Average Senate Republican: 97

Overall, averaged across 10 values of hand-picked votes that split the parties.

Where the money came from

Receipts into Bernard Sanders’s own campaign committee over the 2025–2026 election cycle, through June 30, 2026.

  • Small individual donors$17,272,177
  • Large individual donors$6,505,716
  • PACs$27
  • Other and unclassified$1,150,266
  • Total receipts$24,928,186
What these categories mean
Small individual donors
People whose giving stayed under $200 in total. The FEC does not require them to be named, so who they are is genuinely unknown — not merely unlisted.
Large individual donors
People whose giving passed $200, which is the point at which the campaign must report their name, employer and occupation.
PACs
Political action committees — corporate, trade, union and ideological. Money from an organisation rather than from a person.
Other and unclassified
The remainder once every category above is accounted for: federal funds, offsets, interest, and anything this site could not classify. It is a residual, not a kind of donor.

This is money the campaign itself received. It is not everything spent to win the seat. It excludes leadership PACs, and it excludes independent expenditures and other outside spending — money spent to elect or defeat a candidate by groups they may not lawfully coordinate with, which in a contested race can exceed everything shown above. It is not personal income or net worth, which are a separate filing altogether. Figures are as filed with the Federal Election Commission and are only as current as the last report, covering through June 30, 2026; a cycle still running is a partial count. Check this filing on fec.gov.

Personal finances

Separately from the campaign money above, Bernard Sanders files a report about their own money: what they own, what they owe, what they earn outside Congress, and every stock trade they make. The law requires it, and every figure in it is a range rather than an amount — which is why the columns below are ranges too.

What they report owning, and owing
  • Reported assets$662k to $1.8M33 lines, 4 with no figure
  • Reported debts$200k to $500k2 lines

Every column is read from $0. The solid height is the total of the low ends of the bands the filer ticked; the pale cap runs on to the total of the high ends, and is the range the form allows — not a margin of error and not a guess. Assets less debts comes to $162k to $1.6M — a range, and not a net worth: the form does not ask about a personal residence that earns nothing, about congressional salary, or about the exact value of anything.

What the holdings are
  • Funds and managed accounts21 holdings$330k to $1.0M
  • Bonds, cash and other securities6 holdings$281k to $715k
  • Retirement, pensions and insurance6 holdings, 4 with no figure$51k to $115k
  • Every group$662k to $1.8M

A slice needs one number and a filer ticks a range, so each arc is its group’s floor — the total of the low ends they ticked — and the figure in the hole is the total of those floors. The band printed beside each group is the real answer, and it is wider than the arc. 4 holdings carry no figure at all and are in no arc.

From Bernard Sanders’s own financial disclosure, filed under the Ethics in Government Act. Every figure is the band the filer ticked.

Current senator

Peter Welch

Democrat · holding this seat since 2023

Recorded votes

Yea 7,749Nay 4,305

of 12,398 roll calls across their career.

Government experience

  • Senate · VT2023–2029
  • House · VT2021–2023
  • House · VT2019–2021
  • House · VT2017–2019
  • House · VT2015–2017
  • House · VT2013–2015
  • House · VT2011–2013
  • House · VT2009–2011
  • House · VT2007–2009

Where their votes land

Democratic side0 · Voted with Democrats almost every timeRepublican side
  • Average Senate Democrat: 2
  • Average Senate Republican: 97

Overall, averaged across 11 values of hand-picked votes that split the parties.

Where the money came from

Receipts into Peter Welch’s own campaign committee over the 2025–2026 election cycle, through June 30, 2026.

  • Small individual donors$4,429
  • Large individual donors$67,307
  • PACs$36,500
  • Other and unclassified$110,454
  • Total receipts$218,690
What these categories mean
Small individual donors
People whose giving stayed under $200 in total. The FEC does not require them to be named, so who they are is genuinely unknown — not merely unlisted.
Large individual donors
People whose giving passed $200, which is the point at which the campaign must report their name, employer and occupation.
PACs
Political action committees — corporate, trade, union and ideological. Money from an organisation rather than from a person.
Other and unclassified
The remainder once every category above is accounted for: federal funds, offsets, interest, and anything this site could not classify. It is a residual, not a kind of donor.

This is money the campaign itself received. It is not everything spent to win the seat. It excludes leadership PACs, and it excludes independent expenditures and other outside spending — money spent to elect or defeat a candidate by groups they may not lawfully coordinate with, which in a contested race can exceed everything shown above. It is not personal income or net worth, which are a separate filing altogether. Figures are as filed with the Federal Election Commission and are only as current as the last report, covering through June 30, 2026; a cycle still running is a partial count. Check this filing on fec.gov.

Personal finances

Separately from the campaign money above, Peter Welch files a report about their own money: what they own, what they owe, what they earn outside Congress, and every stock trade they make. The law requires it, and every figure in it is a range rather than an amount — which is why the columns below are ranges too.

What they report owning, and owing
  • Reported assets$6.9M to $19M140 lines, 27 with no figure
  • Reported debts$50k to $100k1 line

Every column is read from $0. The solid height is the total of the low ends of the bands the filer ticked; the pale cap runs on to the total of the high ends, and is the range the form allows — not a margin of error and not a guess. Assets less debts comes to $6.8M to $19M — a range, and not a net worth: the form does not ask about a personal residence that earns nothing, about congressional salary, or about the exact value of anything.

What the holdings are
  • Funds and managed accounts115 holdings, 18 with no figure$5.0M to $12M
  • Bonds, cash and other securities16 holdings$1.9M to $7.0M
  • Retirement, pensions and insurance8 holdings, 8 with no figure—
  • Trusts1 holding, 1 with no figure—
  • Every group$6.9M to $19M

A slice needs one number and a filer ticks a range, so each arc is its group’s floor — the total of the low ends they ticked — and the figure in the hole is the total of those floors. The band printed beside each group is the real answer, and it is wider than the arc. 27 holdings carry no figure at all and are in no arc.

From Peter Welch’s own financial disclosure, filed under the Ethics in Government Act. Every figure is the band the filer ticked.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes no inflation rate for Vermont: prices are collected from a sample built for the nation, the four Census regions and a handful of large metro areas, and nothing in it supports a state figure. The nearest published figure is the Northeast region's, below. See inflation for the country and the four regions.

MeasureValueOver a yearPeriod
Gross domestic product$46.3B up $2.3B2024
Real GDP growth2.5%already a 12-month change2024
GDP per person$71,577 up 5.5%2024
Payroll jobs310.6kprelim. down 1.1kAugust 2026
Jobs added over 12 months-1,100prelim.already a 12-month changeAugust 2026
Unemployment rate (monthly)2.6%prelim. unchangedAugust 2026
Covered jobs309.1kno figure a year earlier2024
Average weekly wage$1,240no figure a year earlier2024
Personal income per person$71,505 up 5.1%2024
Goods exported$2.1B up $167.6M2025
Goods imported$4.0B up $457.7M2025
Trade balance in goods-$1.9B down $290.1M2025
Business establishments32.2kno figure a year earlier2024

Every figure here is one its source published for Vermontitself — nothing is summed from the districts. Payroll jobs and the monthly unemployment rate are seasonally adjusted, and the two newest months of the payroll series are preliminary and get revised. Output is counted where production happens and income where people live, so the two say different things about the same state. An arrow is coloured by the direction its own measure counts as improvement — green on rising output, jobs, income and exports, green on a falling unemployment rate — and stays grey where there is no such direction to claim, as for imports and the count of businesses. The colour is not a claim about anybody.

Latest figures

Click one of the figures to see how it has changed over time.

IndicatorValueMargin of errorPeriod
Total population647,106—2020-2024
Median age43.1 yrs± 0.2 yrs2020-2024
Median household income$81,203± $1,3392020-2024
Poverty rate10.1%± 0.4%2020-2024
Child poverty rate10.8%± 0.7%2020-2024
Unemployment rate3.6%± 0.2%2020-2024
Households receiving SNAP10.6%± 0.4%2020-2024
Income inequality (Gini index)0.453± 0.0052020-2024
Median home value$316,600± $3,3612020-2024
Median gross rent$1,234± $182020-2024
Cost-burdened renters48.4%± 1.7%2020-2024
Homeownership rate73.2%± 0.5%2020-2024
Housing vacancy rate19.4%± 0.4%2020-2024
Uninsured rate3.9%± 0.2%2020-2024
Disability rate14.4%± 0.3%2020-2024
Drug overdose deaths38.2 per 100k—2022-2024
Child mortality38.5 per 100k—2020-2024
Low birth weight7.2%—2020-2024
Teen birth rate1.7 per 1k± 1.7 per 1k2020-2024
Bachelor's degree or higher43.8%± 0.6%2020-2024
Households without internet access6.2%± 0.3%2020-2024
Firearm fatalities12.5 per 100k—2020-2024
Injury deaths108.4 per 100k—2020-2024
Motor vehicle crash deaths10.2 per 100k—2020-2024

US Census Bureau, American Community Survey; CDC WONDER, National Center for Health Statistics. Margins of error are at the 90% confidence level. An estimate is not a count. Every figure here is one its source published for Vermont itself. Nothing is averaged up from the districts, because five of these indicators are medians and the average of medians is not a median, and nothing is summed from counties. No figure here is shown as a change since anybody took office: a state has two senators who took their seats in different years, so there is no single tenure to measure from.

Median household income over time, 2005-2009 to 2020-2024

Pick an indicator, and a second to compare it with. Where they share a unit and a scale they are read against one axis; where they do not, the second gets an axis of its own on the right — nothing is rebased or rescaled to make two units meet. Tick the box to draw them apart instead.

Reference line

Half of households in Vermont earn more than this, half less.

Point at the chart to read a period.

$50,000$60,000$70,000$80,000$90,0002005-20092008-20122011-20152014-20182017-20212020-2024
  • Vermont$81,203 · 2020-2024
  • United Statesreference$80,734 · 2020-2024

Vermont · 2005-2009 to 2020-2024 · United States, dashed · US Census Bureau, American Community Survey

Median household income by period, with 90% margins of error, the same figures in 2025 dollars, and United States at the same periods.
PeriodMedian incomeIn 2025 dollarsMargin of errorUnited States (reference)
2005-2009$51,284$76,959± $467$51,425
2006-2010$51,841$76,539± $447$51,914
2007-2011$53,422$76,460± $468$52,762
2008-2012$54,168$75,956± $617$53,046
2009-2013$54,267$74,996± $548$53,046
2010-2014$54,447$74,044± $555$53,482
2011-2015$55,176$74,946± $561$53,889
2012-2016$56,104$75,257± $793$55,322
2013-2017$57,808$75,926± $741$57,652
2014-2018$60,076$77,023± $656$60,293
2015-2019$61,973$78,041± $662$62,843
2016-2020$63,477$78,961± $710$64,994
2017-2021$67,674$80,404± $896$69,021
2018-2022$74,014$81,421± $1,049$75,149
2019-2023$78,024$82,439± $1,357$78,538
2020-2024$81,203$83,340± $1,339$80,734

The "in 2025 dollars" figures are the published ones restated for inflation with the BLS Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), U.S. city average, all items, annual average. A five-year estimate is published in the dollars of its final year, so 2016-2020 is adjusted from 2020 dollars. The adjustment is the same for every place in a period, so it changes no ranking; it says what a figure from an earlier period would be in today's money. It is not a local cost of living, and the margin of error is still the published one.

Nominal dollars as published for each period -- not inflation-adjusted. A median cannot be averaged across areas, so this is published district-level data only.

This is a median or an index. It is published as measured and is never re-aggregated from smaller areas — averaging medians does not produce a median.

Districts

Who has represented Vermont

Every senator who has held one of Vermont’s two seats, newest first. The record carries no Senate class, so this is one chronology rather than two seat lineages — and unlike a district, a state is the same ground throughout, so there is nothing to break the list at.

Every senator who has held a seat for Vermont, newest first.
SenatorPartyYears
Peter WelchDemocrat2023–present
Bernard Sanders · 4 termsIndependent2007–present
James JeffordsIndependent2001–2007
James Jeffords · 2 termsRepublican1989–2001
Patrick J. Leahy · 8 termsDemocrat1975–2023
Robert Stafford · 3 termsRepublican1971–1989
Winston Prouty · 2 termsRepublican1959–1971
Ralph Flanders · 3 termsRepublican1946–1959
George Aiken · 6 termsRepublican1941–1975
Ernest GibsonRepublican1940–1941
Ernest Gibson · 2 termsRepublican1933–1940
Warren Austin · 3 termsRepublican1931–1946
Frank PartridgeRepublican1930–1931
Frank GreeneRepublican1929–1930
Porter DaleRepublican1927–1933
Frank GreeneRepublican1923–1929
Porter DaleRepublican1923–1927
William DillinghamRepublican1921–1923
Carroll PageRepublican1917–1923
William DillinghamRepublican1915–1921
Carroll PageRepublican1911–1917
William DillinghamRepublican1909–1915
Carroll PageRepublican1908–1911
John StewartRepublican1908–1908
Redfield ProctorRepublican1905–1908
William DillinghamRepublican1903–1909
William DillinghamRepublican1900–1903
Redfield ProctorRepublican1899–1905
Jonathan RossRepublican1899–1900
Justin MorrillRepublican1897–1899
Redfield ProctorRepublican1893–1899
Redfield ProctorRepublican1891–1893
Justin MorrillRepublican1891–1897
George EdmundsRepublican1887–1891
Justin MorrillRepublican1885–1891
George EdmundsRepublican1881–1887
Justin MorrillRepublican1879–1885
George EdmundsRepublican1875–1881
Justin MorrillRepublican1873–1879
Justin MorrillRepublican1867–1873
George Edmunds · 2 termsRepublican1866–1875
Luke PolandRepublican1865–1867
Solomon FootRepublican1863–1867
Jacob CollamerRepublican1861–1865
Solomon FootRepublican1857–1863
Jacob CollamerRepublican1855–1861
Lawrence BrainerdFree Soil1854–1855
Samuel PhelpsWhig1853–1855
Solomon FootInd. Republican-Democrat1851–1857
William UphamWhig1849–1853
Samuel PhelpsWhig1845–1851
William UphamWhig1843–1849
Samuel CraftsWhig1842–1843
Samuel PhelpsWhig1839–1845
Samuel PrentissWhig1837–1843
Benjamin SwiftWhig1833–1839
Samuel PrentissAnti-Jacksonian1831–1837
Horatio SeymourAdams1827–1833
Dudley ChaseAdams1825–1831
Horatio SeymourAdams1821–1827
William Palmer · 2 termsRepublican1818–1825
James FiskRepublican1817–1819
Isaac TichenorFederalist1815–1821
Dudley ChaseRepublican1813–1817
Jonathan RobinsonRepublican1809–1815
Jonathan RobinsonRepublican1807–1809
Stephen BradleyRepublican1807–1813
Israel SmithRepublican1803–1807
Stephen BradleyRepublican1801–1807
Nathaniel ChipmanFederalist1797–1803
Isaac TichenorFederalist1796–1797
Elijah PaineFederalist1795–1801
Stephen Bradley—1791–1795
Moses RobinsonAnti-Administration1791–1796