Jeff Crank: who gave

PACs

Every committee that gave to Jeff Crank’s campaign over the 2025–2026 cycle, as itemized on Form 3 line 11C, “contributions from other political committees”: one row per giving committee, its receipts summed, largest first. It is money from a committee rather than from a person. Most of the line is PACs — corporate, trade, union and ideological committees alike — but it also carries gifts from other candidates’ committees and from leadership PACs, including one the member sponsors, if it gives. What a leadership PAC itself raised is not here: it is a separate committee with its own filing, and its receipts never pass through this one.

The filing’s summary line puts contributions from other political committees (line 11C) at $837,000 — that is the figure the ring above uses — while the itemized schedule behind it, which is what this table adds up, comes to $842,000. The two can legitimately differ: an amended report can replace the summary without re-filing every schedule line, and the summary and the schedule were fetched at different times. Neither figure is wrong; they are the same money read from two places on the form.

Browse these receipts on fec.gov: JEFF CRANK FOR CONGRESS.

Large individual donors

People who gave Jeff Crank’s campaign more than $200 in total, the point at which the campaign must report each gift with the donor’s name, city, employer and occupation. This site shows them in aggregate only: how big the gifts were and which states they came from, never one person at a time. Those itemized lines are public record, and the Federal Election Commission publishes them; the link at the foot of this section opens exactly the receipts these two views are built from, on fec.gov. Committees are named on this page because a committee has an FEC id and a public role; a private donor has neither.

Both views below are the FEC’s own aggregates of itemized individual giving, and they count a donor’s share of joint-fundraising money as if it had been given to this campaign directly. That same money also reaches the campaign as a transfer from the joint fundraising committee, which is the last section of this page, and the by-size view folds the unitemized under-$200 lump into its smallest bucket. The figures here therefore overlap the ring’s slices rather than partitioning them: they must not be added to each other, to the PAC and transfer tables, or to the ring.

By size of gift

The five buckets add to $1,378,707, which is the FEC’s roll-up of all individual giving including joint-fundraising allocations — not the ring’s two individual slices. The $200-and-under bucket combines itemized small gifts with the unitemized lump the campaign reports as a single figure, which is why the FEC gives it no count.

By state

Where itemized individual gifts came from, by the state the donor wrote on the form. In-state means Colorado, the state Jeff Crank represents. A gift with no state recorded is kept apart rather than counted as out-of-state: a blank is not evidence of anywhere. Every share below is of $1,237,054, the sum of every state.

Every itemized individual receipt behind these figures, donor by donor with the name, city, employer and occupation each one reported, is published by the FEC: JEFF CRANK FOR CONGRESS.

Transfers in

Money moved into the campaign from another committee, as itemized on Form 3 line 12, one row per transferring committee. These are almost always joint fundraising committees: a JFC raises money for several candidates at once and passes each their share. The donors behind a transfer appear on this filing only as memo lines on line 11AI, one for the campaign’s share of each gift — counted by the roll-ups above, and listed in full on the JFC’s own filing.

Browse these receipts on fec.gov: JEFF CRANK FOR CONGRESS.