25 CFR 290.10
§ 290.10 Is an Indian tribe in violation of IGRA if it makes per capita payments to its members from net gaming revenues without an approved tribal revenue allocation plan?
United States · 25 CFR — Indians · Status: effective
Cite this
- Citation
- 25 CFR 290.10, § 290.10 Is an Indian tribe in violation of IGRA if it makes per capita payments to its members from net gaming revenues without an approved tribal revenue allocation plan?, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/107102
- Permanent ID
ys:prov:107102@1- SHA-256
9b6c91bdc196cc742e86cbc2b89bf80edb0c5452639e93c83fb6f355376ec1cd
The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.
Full text
Yes, you are in violation of IGRA if you make per capita payments to your tribal members from net gaming revenues without an approved tribal revenue allocation plan. If you refuse to comply, the DOJ or NIGC may enforce the per capita requirements of IGRA.
Legislative history
This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.