25 CFR 293.18
§ 293.18 May a compact or amendment include provisions addressing the State's costs for regulating gaming activities?
United States · 25 CFR — Indians · Status: effective
Cite this
- Citation
- 25 CFR 293.18, § 293.18 May a compact or amendment include provisions addressing the State's costs for regulating gaming activities?, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/107188
- Permanent ID
ys:prov:107188@1- SHA-256
457ea3fe2066fdbfa95e7a0808f7fdf6a447fc059ae2333774bab66bcb698609
The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.
Full text
Yes. If the compact or amendment includes a negotiated allocation of jurisdiction to the State for the regulation of the gaming activity, the compact or amendment may include provisions to defray the State's actual and reasonable costs for regulating the specific Tribe's gaming activity. If the compact does not include requirements for the State to show actual and reasonable annual expenses for regulating the specific Tribe's gaming activity over the life of the compact, the lack of such a requirement may be considered evidence of a violation of IGRA.
Legislative history
This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.