yourstate.us
25 CFR 900.186

§ 900.186 Is it necessary for a self-determination contract to include any clauses about Federal Tort Claims Act coverage?

United States · 25 CFR — Indians · Status: effective

Get this as JSONEmbed this
Cite this
Citation
25 CFR 900.186, § 900.186 Is it necessary for a self-determination contract to include any clauses about Federal Tort Claims Act coverage?, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/108101
Permanent ID
ys:prov:108101@1
SHA-256
d3cbc354c9835c353fec48714c494c6b257807aeac506ecbe5c96f8ffb4bf33e

The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.

Full text

No, it is optional. At the request of Indian tribes and tribal organizations, self-determination contracts shall include the following clauses to clarify the scope of FTCA coverage: (a) The following clause may be used for all contracts: For purposes of Federal Tort Claims Act coverage, the contractor and its employees (including individuals performing personal services contracts with the contractor to provide health care services) are deemed to be employees of the Federal government while performing work under this contract. This status is not changed by the source of the funds used by the contractor to pay the employee's salary and benefits unless the employee receives additional compensation for performing covered services from anyone other than the contractor. (b) The following clause is for IHS contracts only: Under this contract, the contractor's employee may be required as a condition of employment to provide health services to non-IHS beneficiaries in order to meet contractual obligations. These services may be provided in either contractor or non-contractor facilities. The employee's status for Federal Tort Claims Act purposes is not affected.

Legislative history

This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.