25 CFR 900.247
§ 900.247 Under what circumstances is a reassumption considered an emergency instead of non-emergency reassumption?
United States · 25 CFR — Indians · Status: effective
Cite this
- Citation
- 25 CFR 900.247, § 900.247 Under what circumstances is a reassumption considered an emergency instead of non-emergency reassumption?, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/108158
- Permanent ID
ys:prov:108158@1- SHA-256
a9a2b4c3134d097466bd50659f9965c94c28503615476fb4bd19d10e495e0fd1
The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.
Full text
(a) A reassumption is considered an emergency reassumption if an Indian tribe or tribal organization fails to fulfill the requirements of the contract and this failure poses:
(1) An immediate threat of imminent harm to the safety of any person; or
(2) Imminent substantial and irreparable harm to trust funds, trust lands, or interest in such lands.
(b) A reassumption is considered a non-emergency reassumption if there has been:
(1) A violation of the rights or endangerment of the health, safety, or welfare of any person; or
(2) Gross negligence or mismanagement in the handling or use of:
(i) Contract funds;
(ii) Trust funds;
(iii) Trust lands; or
(iv) Interests in trust lands under the contract.
Legislative history
This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.