25 CFR 1000.1805
§ 1000.1805 Is a decision by a Tribe/Consortium not to include a program in a successor agreement considered a retrocession?
United States · 25 CFR — Indians · Status: effective
Cite this
- Citation
- 25 CFR 1000.1805, § 1000.1805 Is a decision by a Tribe/Consortium not to include a program in a successor agreement considered a retrocession?, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/108447
- Permanent ID
ys:prov:108447@1- SHA-256
20a71a4b445bcfc4111b7869edd394488d6b1188aa4c830661dce6d193b60274
The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.
Full text
No, a decision by a Tribe/Consortium not to include a program in a successor agreement is not considered a retrocession.
Legislative history
This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.