yourstate.us
25 CFR 1000.1805

§ 1000.1805 Is a decision by a Tribe/Consortium not to include a program in a successor agreement considered a retrocession?

United States · 25 CFR — Indians · Status: effective

Get this as JSONEmbed this
Cite this
Citation
25 CFR 1000.1805, § 1000.1805 Is a decision by a Tribe/Consortium not to include a program in a successor agreement considered a retrocession?, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/108447
Permanent ID
ys:prov:108447@1
SHA-256
20a71a4b445bcfc4111b7869edd394488d6b1188aa4c830661dce6d193b60274

The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.

Full text

No, a decision by a Tribe/Consortium not to include a program in a successor agreement is not considered a retrocession.

Legislative history

This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.