N.Y. Environmental Conservation Law § 27-1413
Alternatives analysis
New York · New York Environmental Conservation Law · Status: effective · Effective 2014-09-22
Cite this
- Citation
- N.Y. Environmental Conservation Law § 27-1413, Alternatives analysis, New York, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-25, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/1104012
- Permanent ID
ys:prov:1104012@1- SHA-256
706b1796e55834aa46245f1bd6295583180092d6341331bd5f43bc385ab63934
The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.
Full text
§ 27-1413. Alternatives analysis.
1. For sites proposed to be remediated under Track 1 pursuant to
section 27-1415 of this title, the applicant shall develop and evaluate
at least one remedial alternative.
2. For all other sites, the applicant shall develop and evaluate at
least two remedial alternatives, one of which would achieve a Track 1
cleanup. The department shall have the discretion to require the
evaluation of additional alternatives at a site that has been determined
to pose a significant threat. The applicant shall submit the
alternatives analysis as a part of the remedial work plan to the
department for review, approval, modification or rejection.
3. Unless the applicant has elected to remediate the site to Track 1,
the department may require the applicant, as a condition of continuing
under this program, to develop and evaluate a Track 2 cleanup pursuant
to section 27-1415 of this title for such non-significant threat site
upon due consideration of the following factors:
(a) the degree to which the remedy selection criteria would be better
satisfied by a Track 2 cleanup;
(b) the degree of impact a Track 2 cleanup would have on the
applicant's ability to successfully cleanup and/or redevelop the
property;
(c) the benefit to the environment to be realized by the expeditious
remediation of the property; and
(d) the economic benefit to the state to be realized by the
expeditious remediation of the property.
4. For sites that the department has determined constitute a
significant threat, the department shall select the remedy from a
department-approved alternatives analysis prepared by the applicant.
5. For sites that the department has determined do not constitute a
significant threat, the applicant may select the remedy from a
department-approved alternatives analysis, which analysis shall contain
at least two remedial alternatives as set forth in subdivision two of
this section. Provided, however, that where the department has required
the applicant to develop and evaluate a Track 2 cleanup, the department
shall have the discretion to, as a condition of continuing under this
program, require the applicant to implement such remedy.