yourstate.us
28 CFR 16.79

§ 16.79 Exemption of Pardon Attorney System.

United States · 28 CFR — Judicial Administration · Status: effective

Get this as JSONEmbed this
Cite this
Citation
28 CFR 16.79, § 16.79 Exemption of Pardon Attorney System, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/120062
Permanent ID
ys:prov:120062@1
SHA-256
fcedb719b86f5d98b73b593a236c57fe2376df92a1c0fc76243280dfd327a341

The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.

Full text

(a) The following system of records is exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a, subsections (c)(3), (c)(4), (d)(1), (d)(2), (d)(3), (d)(4), and (e)(5): Executive Clemency Case Files/Executive Clemency Tracking System (JUSTICE/OPA-001). These exemptions apply only to the extent that information in this system of records is subject to exemption pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2). (b) Exemption from the particular subsections is justified for the following reasons: (1) From subsection (c)(3) because: (i) The purpose of the creation and maintenance of the Executive Clemency Case Files/Executive Clemency Tracking System (JUSTICE/OPA-001) is to enable the Justice Department to prepare reports and recommendations to the President for his ultimate decisions on clemency matters, which are committed to exclusive discretion of the President pursuant to Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution. (ii) Release of the disclosure accounting, for disclosures pursuant to the routine uses published for this system, would permit the requester to obtain valuable information concerning the nature and scope of a clemency investigation, invade the right of candid and confidential communications among officials concerned with making recommendations to the President in clemency matters, and disclose the identity of persons who furnished information to the Government under an express or implied promise that their identities would be held in confidence. (2) From subsection (c)(4) because the exemption from subsections (d)(1), (d)(2), (d)(3), and (d)(4) will make notification of disputes inapplicable. (3) From subsections (d)(1), (d)(2), (d)(3), and (d)(4) is justified for the reasons stated in paragraph (b)(1) of this section. (4) From subsection (e)(5) is justified for the reasons stated in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.

Legislative history

This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.