yourstate.us
29 CFR 1620.20

§ 1620.20 Pay differentials claimed to be based on extra duties.

United States · 29 CFR — Labor · Status: effective

Get this as JSONEmbed this
Cite this
Citation
29 CFR 1620.20, § 1620.20 Pay differentials claimed to be based on extra duties, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/128018
Permanent ID
ys:prov:128018@1
SHA-256
8c1802b742bae44ab180e56c4f7c8e7283a9225255096ef5afcea48133db875f

The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.

Full text

Additional duties may not be a defense to the payment of higher wages to one sex where the higher pay is not related to the extra duties. The Commission will scrutinize such a defense to determine whether it is bona fide. For example, an employer cannot successfully assert an extra duties defense where: (a) Employees of the higher paid sex receive the higher pay without doing the extra work; (b) Members of the lower paid sex also perform extra duties requiring equal skill, effort, and responsibility; (c) The proffered extra duties do not in fact exist; (d) The extra task consumes a minimal amount of time and is of peripheral importance; or (e) Third persons (i.e., individuals who are not in the two groups of employees being compared) who do the extra task as their primary job are paid less than the members of the higher paid sex for whom there is an attempt to justify the pay differential.

Legislative history

This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.