yourstate.us
29 CFR 1978.114

§ 1978.114 District court jurisdiction of retaliation complaints under STAA.

United States · 29 CFR — Labor · Status: effective

Get this as JSONEmbed this
Cite this
Citation
29 CFR 1978.114, § 1978.114 District court jurisdiction of retaliation complaints under STAA, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/129744
Permanent ID
ys:prov:129744@1
SHA-256
d89e29e33ecca0662bf89520e6c0908ec1e6af27f0a9272f188b5fb12bd92ab1

The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.

Full text

(a) If there is no final order of the Secretary, 210 days have passed since the filing of the complaint, and there is no showing that there has been delay due to the bad faith of the complainant, the complainant may bring an action at law or equity for de novo review in the appropriate district court of the United States, which will have jurisdiction over such an action without regard to the amount in controversy. The action shall, at the request of either party to such action, be tried by the court with a jury. (b) Within seven days after filing a complaint in federal court, a complainant must file with the Assistant Secretary, the ALJ, or the ARB, depending on where the proceeding is pending, a copy of the file-stamped complaint. A copy of the complaint also must be served on the OSHA official who issued the findings and/or preliminary order, the Assistant Secretary, and the Associate Solicitor, Division of Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. Department of Labor.

Legislative history

This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.