29 CFR 2570.116
§ 2570.116 Scope of discovery.
United States · 29 CFR — Labor · Status: effective
Cite this
- Citation
- 29 CFR 2570.116, § 2570.116 Scope of discovery, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/130463
- Permanent ID
ys:prov:130463@1- SHA-256
0fa27f3cf4700dd9aced0c46a6813b4b6d92f7917e6354f7be4c5959e5c25771
The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.
Full text
For 502(c)(6) civil penalty proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of § 18.14 of this title.
(a) A party may file a motion to conduct discovery with the administrative law judge. The motion for discovery shall be granted by the administrative law judge only upon a showing of good cause. In order to establish “good cause” for the purposes of this section, a party must show that the discovery requested relates to a genuine issue as to a material fact that is relevant to the proceeding. The order of the administrative law judge shall expressly limit the scope and terms of discovery to that for which “good cause” has been shown, as provided in this paragraph.
(b) A party may obtain discovery of documents and tangible things otherwise discoverable under paragraph (a) of this section and prepared in anticipation of or for the hearing by or for another party's representative (including his or her attorney, consultant, surety, indemnitor, insurer, or agent) only upon showing that the party seeking discovery has substantial need of the materials or information in the preparation of his or her case and that he or she is unable without undue hardship to obtain the substantial equivalent of the materials or information by other means. In ordering discovery of such materials when the required showing has been made, the administrative law judge shall protect against disclosure of the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, or legal theories of an attorney or other representatives of a party concerning the proceeding.
Legislative history
This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.