yourstate.us
N.J. Stat. § 26:2C-19.2

Entitlement to affirmative defense

New Jersey · New Jersey Statutes Title 26 — Health and Vital Statistics · Status: effective

Get this as JSONEmbed this
Cite this
Citation
N.J. Stat. § 26:2C-19.2, Entitlement to affirmative defense, New Jersey, version 1 as recorded 2026-09-28, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/1453566
Permanent ID
ys:prov:1453566@1
SHA-256
b2563b89a9cb75ad274e466fa7bf38e6ef139d748026a27d1ff37cf467233602

The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.

Full text

2. a. A person shall be entitled to an affirmative defense to liability for penalties for a violation of a condition, emission rate, limit, or standard, required pursuant to a permit issued pursuant to P.L.1954, c.212 (C.26:2C-1 et seq.) or a violation of any rule or regulation adopted pursuant to P.L.1954, c.212, when the violation occurs as a result of an equipment malfunction, an equipment start-up, or an equipment shut-down, or during the performance of necessary equipment maintenance. A person shall be entitled to this affirmative defense only if the person complies with the provisions of subsection b. of this section. b. A person asserting an affirmative defense pursuant to subsection a. of this section shall notify the department of the violation by 5:00 p.m. of the second full calendar day following the occurrence, or if due diligence was exercised to discover the violation, by 5:00 p.m. of the second full calendar day after becoming aware of the occurrence, and, within 30 days thereof, shall submit written documentation on the circumstances of the violation and demonstrating as applicable, that: (1) the violation occurred, and was caused by an equipment malfunction, an equipment start-up, or an equipment shut-down, or during the performance of necessary equipment maintenance, as applicable; (2) the facility was being operated with due care; (3) the violation did not result from operator error or failure to maintain the equipment with due care; (4) the person has taken all reasonable steps to minimize levels of emissions caused by the violation; and (5) with respect to violations caused by a malfunction, the malfunction is not a part of a recurrent pattern.