yourstate.us
Wash. Rev. Code § 29A.92.021

Disparate burden on protected class prohibited—Factors

Washington · Revised Code of Washington Chapter 29A.92 — Voting Rights Act · Status: effective

Get this as JSONEmbed this
Cite this
Citation
Wash. Rev. Code § 29A.92.021, Disparate burden on protected class prohibited—Factors, Washington, version 1 as recorded 2026-09-28, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/1503167
Permanent ID
ys:prov:1503167@1
SHA-256
585dbb3527a033515f6b80899e688859363b6009ca5dc417acd4898bb2b2f89c

The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.

Full text

(1) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, no political subdivision responsible for election administration may abridge the rights of voters who are members of a protected class or classes by implementing, imposing, or enforcing any election policy or practice, or taking any action or failing to take any action, that results in, is likely to result in, or is intended to result in a material disparate burden on the ability or opportunity of members of a protected class to vote or participate in any stage of the political process. (2) It is not a violation of subsection (1) of this section if the political subdivision responsible for election administration demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that: (a) The election policy or practice is narrowly tailored and necessary to further a compelling, particularized state interest; and(b) There is no alternative election policy or practice that would result in less of a disparate burden on members of a protected class. (3) Proof of intent to discriminate against a protected class by a political subdivision responsible for election administration is not required for a cause of action to be sustained under this section. (4) The following are circumstances not relevant, and may not be considered, to demonstrate a violation of subsection (1) of this section: (a) The total number or share of protected class members not materially burdened by the election policy or practice; (b) The degree to which the election policy or practice has a long pedigree or was in widespread use at an earlier date; (c) The use of an identical or similar election policy or practice in other jurisdictions; (d) The availability of other forms of voting unimpacted by the election policy or practice; and(e) Defenses that the election policy or practice is necessary to address criminal activity, including voter fraud, or to bolster voter confidence in election integrity that are not supported by substantial evidence. (5) A class of people protected by this section may include a coalition of members of different racial, color, or language minority groups.