yourstate.us
36 CFR 223.140

§ 223.140 Scope of debarment.

United States · 36 CFR — Parks, Forests, and Public Property · Status: effective

Get this as JSONEmbed this
Cite this
Citation
36 CFR 223.140, § 223.140 Scope of debarment, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/159472
Permanent ID
ys:prov:159472@1
SHA-256
d43db28b43cc9ebb49ff72680760b7fccccc58335fb6c41f016209f6f827871d

The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.

Full text

(a) Scope in general. (1) Debarment of a purchaser constitutes debarment of all divisions or other organizational elements of the purchaser, unless the debarment decision is limited by its terms to specific divisions, organizational elements, or classes of sales. (2) The debarring official may extend a debarment decision to include any affiliates of the purchaser, if they are— (i) Specifically named and (ii) Given written notice of the proposed debarment and provided an opportunity to respond (see § 223.138(b)). (b) Imputing conduct. For purposes of determining the scope of debarment, conduct may be imputed as follows: (1) The fraudulent, criminal, or other seriously improper conduct of any officer, director, shareholder, partner, employee, or other individual associated with a purchaser may be imputed to a purchaser when the conduct occurred in connection with the individual's performance of duties for or on behalf of the purchaser, or with the purchaser's knowledge, approval, or acquiescence. The purchaser's acceptance of the benefits derived from the conduct shall be evidence of such knowledge, approval, or acquiescence. (2) The fraudulent, criminal, or other seriously improper conduct of a purchaser may be imputed to any officer, director, shareholder, partner, employee, or other individual associated with the purchaser who participated in, knew of, or has reason to know of the purchaser's conduct. (3) The fraudulent, criminal, or other seriously improper conduct of one purchaser participating in a joint venture or similar arrangement may be imputed to other participating purchasers if the conduct occurred for or on behalf of the joint venture or similar arrangement or with the knowledge, approval, or acquiescence of those purchasers. Acceptance of the benefits derived from the conduct shall be evidence of such knowledge, approval or acquiescence.

Legislative history

This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.