41 CFR 302-17.45
§ 302-17.45 Procedures when a State treats an expense as taxable even though it is nontaxable under the Federal IRC.
United States · 41 CFR — Public Contracts and Property Management · Status: effective
Cite this
- Citation
- 41 CFR 302-17.45, § 302-17.45 Procedures when a State treats an expense as taxable even though it is nontaxable under the Federal IRC, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/200188
- Permanent ID
ys:prov:200188@1- SHA-256
95aac9cafe0fae382108d52ca83d001543f573af217c46f891b0779c9dfe4143
The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.
Full text
If one or more of the States where an employee has incurred tax liability for relocation expenses treats one or more relocation expenses as taxable, even though it (they) are nontaxable under Federal tax rules, employees may be required to pay additional State income tax when they file tax returns with those States. In this case, the agency calculates a state gross-up to cover the additional tax liability resulting from the covered relocation expense reimbursement(s) that are nontaxable under Federal, but not State tax rules. The agency calculates the State gross-up and then adds that amount to the RITA. The agency will use this formula to calculate the state gross-up:
This calculation is the same, regardless of whether the agency has chosen to use the one-year or two-year RITA process.
Legislative history
This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.