yourstate.us
42 CFR 51b.605

§ 51b.605 How will grant applications be evaluated and the grants awarded?

United States · 42 CFR — Public Health · Status: effective

Get this as JSONEmbed this
Cite this
Citation
42 CFR 51b.605, § 51b.605 How will grant applications be evaluated and the grants awarded?, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/200878
Permanent ID
ys:prov:200878@1
SHA-256
4092096fab7c3e10bceb1c49edb7cfe10459f5c557812b434f53c7656dfa2439

The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.

Full text

(a) Within the limits of funds available, the Secretary may award a grant to assist in meeting the costs of special activities authorized under section 318(b) of the Act. (b) Grant applications will be reviewed and evaluated according to the following criteria: (1) Is there adequate evidence that the proposed project is needed and that the outcome has potential to directly benefit the national venereal disease control effort? (2) Are the project objectives specific, measurable, realistic, time phased, and related to promoting the purposes of section 318? (3) Is the method of operation logical and clearly related to project objectives, and does it describe how the applicant intends to proceed particularly with activities which are complex, interrelated, or unprecedented? (4) Does the method of operation include an assessment of any possible impact, both positive and negative, that the conduct of the proposed initiative might have upon the established venereal disease control program in the locality or localities in which the project will be undertaken? (5) Does the proposal include a comprehensive and realistic plan for the evaluation of the project, and specify the measures and instruments of measurement to be used? (6) Is the budget request reasonable and consistent with the intended use of grant funds? (7) If the applicant intends only to evaluate an existing disease prevention and control approach, are the objectives substantially different from those which could be met by routine program evaluation?

Legislative history

This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.