42 CFR 52h.7
§ 52h.7 What matters must be reviewed for grants?
United States · 42 CFR — Public Health · Status: effective
Cite this
- Citation
- 42 CFR 52h.7, § 52h.7 What matters must be reviewed for grants?, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/200993
- Permanent ID
ys:prov:200993@1- SHA-256
a1e29b93298807fd4fb69ae72d653d6c5cf0a681e04c0d8dbf9a5d4e4f993c41
The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.
Full text
(a) Except as otherwise provided by law, no awarding official shall award a grant based upon an application covered by this part unless the application has been reviewed by a peer review group in accordance with the provisions of this part and the group has made recommendations concerning the scientific merit of that application. In addition, where under applicable law an awarding official is required to secure the approval or advice of a national council or board concerning an application, the application may not be considered by the council or board unless it has been reviewed by the appropriate peer review group, in accordance with the provisions of this part, and the group has made recommendations concerning the scientific merit of the application, except where the council or board is the peer review group.
(b) Except to the extent otherwise provided by law, recommendations by peer review groups are advisory only and not binding on the awarding official or the national advisory council or board.
Legislative history
This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.