42 CFR 52h.8
§ 52h.8 What are the review criteria for grants?
United States · 42 CFR — Public Health · Status: effective
Cite this
- Citation
- 42 CFR 52h.8, § 52h.8 What are the review criteria for grants?, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/200994
- Permanent ID
ys:prov:200994@1- SHA-256
4462bc08dd1e4207ad338919e19012b52944bec21af9c84c94cdab852ad09c22
The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.
Full text
In carrying out its review under § 52h.7, the scientific peer review group shall assess the overall impact that the project could have on the research field involved, taking into account, among other pertinent factors:
(a) The significance of the goals of the proposed research, from a scientific or technical standpoint;
(b) The adequacy of the approach and methodology proposed to carry out the research;
(c) The innovativeness and originality of the proposed research;
(d) The qualifications and experience of the principal investigator and proposed staff;
(e) The scientific environment and reasonable availability of resources necessary to the research;
(f) The adequacy of plans to include both genders, minorities, children and special populations as appropriate for the scientific goals of the research;
(g) The reasonableness of the proposed budget and duration in relation to the proposed research; and
(h) The adequacy of the proposed protection for humans, animals, and the environment, to the extent they may be adversely affected by the project proposed in the application.
Legislative history
This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.