yourstate.us
42 CFR 414.1275

§ 414.1275 Value-based payment modifier quality-tiering scoring methodology.

United States · 42 CFR — Public Health · Status: effective

Get this as JSONEmbed this
Cite this
Citation
42 CFR 414.1275, § 414.1275 Value-based payment modifier quality-tiering scoring methodology, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/203998
Permanent ID
ys:prov:203998@1
SHA-256
2ec65bd5a0e23db8a26846f9c6ff0f33097c7def2e85374e3019daac007a3f18

The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.

Full text

(a) The value-based payment modifier amount for a group and a solo practitioner subject to the value-based payment modifier is based upon a comparison of the composite of quality of care measures and a composite of cost measures. (b) Quality composite and cost composite are classified into high, average, and low categories based on whether the composites are statistically above, not different from, or below the mean composite scores. (1) Quality composites that are one or more standard deviations above the mean are classified into the high category. Quality composites that are one or more standard deviations below the mean are classified into the low category. (2) Cost composites that are one or more standard deviations below the mean are classified into the low category. Cost composites that are one or more standard deviations above the mean are classified into the high category. (c)(1) The following value-based payment modifier percentages apply to the CY 2015 payment adjustment period: CY 2015 Value-Based Payment Modifier Amounts for the Quality-Tiering Approach (2) The following value-based payment modifier percentages apply to the CY 2016 payment adjustment period: CY 2016 Value-Based Payment Modifier Amounts for the Quality-Tiering Approach (3) The following value-based payment modifier percentages apply to the CY 2017 payment adjustment period: (i) For groups with 10 or more eligible professionals: CY 2017 Value-Based Payment Modifier Amounts for the Quality-Tiering Approach for Groups With 10 or More Eligible Professionals (ii) For groups with two to nine eligible professionals and solo practitioners: CY 2017 Value-Based Payment Modifier Amounts for the Quality-Tiering Approach for Groups With Two to Nine Eligible Professionals and Solo Practitioners (4) The following value-based payment modifier percentages apply to the CY 2018 payment adjustment period, for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, and certified registered nurse anesthetists who are solo practitioners or who are in groups of any size: CY 2018 Value-Based Payment Modifier Amounts for the Quality-Tiering Approach for Physicians, Physician Assistants, Nurse Practitioners, Clinical Nurse Specialists, and Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (d)(1) Groups of physicians subject to the value-based payment modifier that have an attributed beneficiary population with an average risk score in the top 25 percent of the risk scores of beneficiaries nationwide and for the CY 2015 payment adjustment period elect the quality-tiering approach or for the CY 2016 payment adjustment period are subject to the quality-tiering approach, receive a greater upward payment adjustment as follows: (i) Classified as high quality/low cost receive an upward adjustment of + 3x (rather than + 2x); and (ii) Classified as either high quality/average cost or average quality/low cost receive an upward adjustment of + 2x (rather than + 1x). (2) Groups and solo practitioners subject to the value-based payment modifier that have an attributed beneficiary population with an average risk score in the top 25 percent of the risk scores of beneficiaries nationwide and for the CY 2017 payment adjustment period are subject to the quality-tiering approach, receive a greater upward payment adjustment as follows: (i) Classified as high quality/low cost receive an upward adjustment of + 5x (rather than + 4x) if the group has 10 or more eligible professionals or + 3x (rather than + 2x) if a solo practitioner or the group has two to nine eligible professionals; and (ii) Classified as either high quality/average cost or average quality/low cost receive an upward adjustment of + 3x (rather than + 2x) if the group has 10 or more eligible professionals or + 2x (rather than + 1x) if a solo practitioner or the group has two to nine eligible professionals. (3) Groups and solo practitioners subject to the value-based payment modifier that have an attributed beneficiary population with an average risk score in the top 25 percent of the risk scores of beneficiaries nationwide and for the CY 2018 payment adjustment period are subject to the quality-tiering approach, receive a greater upward payment adjustment as follows: (i) Classified as high quality/low cost receive an upward adjustment of +3x (rather than +2x); and (ii) Classified as either high quality/average cost or average quality/low cost receive an upward adjustment of +2x (rather than +1x).

Legislative history

This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.