yourstate.us
42 CFR 422.660

§ 422.660 Right to a hearing, burden of proof, standard of proof, and standards of review.

United States · 42 CFR — Public Health · Status: effective

Get this as JSONEmbed this
Cite this
Citation
42 CFR 422.660, § 422.660 Right to a hearing, burden of proof, standard of proof, and standards of review, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/204682
Permanent ID
ys:prov:204682@1
SHA-256
ddd859b4b27e058f8c945550e94b1483c1d2ab5c3b46b24e1b3b2b3e9297ecdb

The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.

Full text

(a) Right to a hearing. The following parties are entitled to a hearing: (1) A contract applicant that has been determined to be unqualified to enter into a contract with CMS under Part C of Title XVIII of the Act in accordance with §§ 422.501 and 422.502. (2) An MA organization whose contract has been terminated in accordance with § 422.510. (3) An MA organization whose contract has not been renewed in accordance with § 422.506. (4) An MA organization who has had an intermediate sanction imposed in accordance with § 422.752(a) through (b) of this part. (5) An applicant that has been determined to be unqualified to offer a Specialized MA Plan for Special Needs Individuals. (b) Burden of proof, standard of proof, and standards of review at a hearing. (1) During a hearing to review a contract determination as described at § 422.641(a) of this subpart, the applicant has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that CMS' determination was inconsistent with the requirements of §§ 422.501 and 422.502 of this part. (2) During a hearing to review a contract determination as described at § 422.641(b) of this subpart, the MA organization has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that CMS' determination was inconsistent with the requirements of § 422.506 of this part. (3) During a hearing to review a contract determination as described at § 422.641(c) of this subpart, the MA organization has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that CMS' determination was inconsistent with the requirements of § 422.510 of this part. (4) During a hearing to review the imposition of an intermediate sanction as described at § 422.750, the MA organization has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that CMS' determination was inconsistent with the requirements of § 422.752(a) and (b). (5) During a hearing to review a determination as described at § 422.641(d) of this subpart, the applicant has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that CMS' determination was inconsistent with the requirements of §§ 422.2; 422.4(a)(1)(iv); 422.101(f); 422.107, if applicable; and 422.152(g) of this part. (c) Timing of favorable decisions. Notice of any decision favorable to the MA organization appealing a determination that it is not qualified to enter into a contract with CMS must be issued by September 1 for the contract in question to be effective on January 1 of the following year.

Legislative history

This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.