Nev. Rev. Stat. § 48.035
Exclusion of relevant evidence on grounds of prejudice, confusion or waste of time
Nevada · Nevada Revised Statutes Chapter 48 — Admissibility Generally · Status: effective
Cite this
- Citation
- Nev. Rev. Stat. § 48.035, Exclusion of relevant evidence on grounds of prejudice, confusion or waste of time, Nevada, version 1 as recorded 2026-10-03, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/2074142
- Permanent ID
ys:prov:2074142@1- SHA-256
90ef288b9b2da74bccf03c48065e08423f727d7e495253f1e5818cde4cb5dc9a
The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.
Full text
1. Although relevant, evidence is not admissible if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, of confusion of the issues or of misleading the jury.
2. Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by considerations of undue delay, waste of time or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.
3. Evidence of another act or crime which is so closely related to an act in controversy or a crime charged that an ordinary witness cannot describe the act in controversy or the crime charged without referring to the other act or crime shall not be excluded, but at the request of an interested party, a cautionary instruction shall be given explaining the reason for its admission.