Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.227
Videotaped depositions: Order of court; notice to parties; cross-examination; use
Nevada · Nevada Revised Statutes Chapter 174 — Arraignment and Preparation for Trial · Status: effective
Cite this
- Citation
- Nev. Rev. Stat. § 174.227, Videotaped depositions: Order of court; notice to parties; cross-examination; use, Nevada, version 1 as recorded 2026-10-03, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/2087475
- Permanent ID
ys:prov:2087475@1- SHA-256
0e37a6beb2f21c6f8ad86bc730dd7266993111e66c57d6af5cd05452e339121a
The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.
Full text
1. A court on its own motion or on the motion of the district attorney may, for good cause shown, order the taking of a videotaped deposition of:
(a) A victim of sexual abuse as that term is defined in NRS 432B.100;
(b) A prospective witness in any criminal prosecution if the witness is less than 14 years of age;
(c) A victim of sex trafficking as that term is defined in subsection 2 of NRS 201.300; or
(d) A victim of facilitating sex trafficking as that term is defined in subsection 1 of NRS 201.301. There is a rebuttable presumption that good cause exists where the district attorney seeks to take the deposition of a person alleged to be the victim of sex trafficking.
Ê The court may specify the time and place for taking the deposition and the persons who may be present when it is taken.
2. The district attorney shall give every other party reasonable written notice of the time and place for taking the deposition. The notice must include the name of the person to be examined. On the motion of a party upon whom the notice is served, the court:
(a) For good cause shown may release the address of the person to be examined; and
(b) For cause shown may extend or shorten the time.
3. If at the time such a deposition is taken, the district attorney anticipates using the deposition at trial, the court shall so state in the order for the deposition and the accused must be given the opportunity to cross-examine the deponent in the same manner as permitted at trial.
4. Except as limited by NRS 174.228, the court may allow the videotaped deposition to be used at any proceeding in addition to or in lieu of the direct testimony of the deponent. It may also be used by any party to contradict or impeach the testimony of the deponent as a witness. If only a part of the deposition is offered in evidence by a party, an adverse party may require the party to offer all of it which is relevant to the part offered and any party may offer other parts.