Nev. Rev. Stat. § 217.580
Considerations for determination whether to provide certification to petitioner; content of certification
Nevada · Nevada Revised Statutes Chapter 217 — Aid to Certain Victims of Crime · Status: effective
Cite this
- Citation
- Nev. Rev. Stat. § 217.580, Considerations for determination whether to provide certification to petitioner; content of certification, Nevada, version 1 as recorded 2026-10-03, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/2090961
- Permanent ID
ys:prov:2090961@1- SHA-256
444f171745e744f1cdf6962f9f9afbd595059af4ca989200fbc42ccff62c42da
The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.
Full text
1. Upon the request of a petitioner for a certification, a certifying agency shall determine whether the petitioner:
(a) Was the victim of criminal activity; and
(b) Has been helpful, is being helpful or is likely to be helpful to the investigation or prosecution of the criminal activity.
2. If a certifying agency determines that a petitioner satisfies the requirements of subsection 1, the certifying official shall complete and sign the certification. A completed certification must include, without limitation, a detailed description of:
(a) The nature of the criminal activity described in subsection 1; and
(b) The helpfulness of a petitioner or the likeliness that a petitioner will be helpful in the investigation or prosecution of that criminal activity.
3. For the purpose of determining whether the petitioner meets the requirements of subsection 1, the certifying agency shall not consider:
(a) The period of time between when the petitioner was victimized by the criminal activity and when the petitioner submitted his or her request for certification;
(b) Whether there is an active investigation of the criminal activity;
(c) Whether a formal statement of charges has been filed regarding the alleged criminal activity; or
(d) Whether there was a prosecution or conviction of the criminal activity.
4. For the purpose of determining helpfulness pursuant to subsection 1, there is a rebuttable presumption that a petitioner has been helpful, is being helpful or is likely to be helpful to the investigation or prosecution of the criminal activity, unless the petitioner refused or failed to provide assistance that was reasonably requested by a law enforcement agency in the investigation or prosecution of that criminal activity.