43 CFR 3120.32
§ 3120.32 Expression of interest leasing preference.
United States · 43 CFR — Public Lands: Interior · Status: effective
Cite this
- Citation
- 43 CFR 3120.32, § 3120.32 Expression of interest leasing preference, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/211877
- Permanent ID
ys:prov:211877@1- SHA-256
e246d41ae696ca16dd004f66cb93595279ee9e3550cb117b3897b17fda70ecae
The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.
Full text
When determining whether the BLM should offer lands specified in an expression of interest at lease sales, the BLM will evaluate the Secretary's obligations to manage public lands for multiple use and sustained yield and to take any action required to prevent unnecessary or undue degradation of the lands and their resources, along with other applicable legal requirements. In evaluating the lands to be offered, as part of the scoping process, the BLM will consider, at minimum:
(a) Proximity to oil and gas development existing at the time of the BLM's evaluation, giving preference to lands upon which a prudent operator would seek to expand existing operations;
(b) The presence of important fish and wildlife habitats or connectivity areas, giving preference to lands that would not impair the proper functioning of such habitats or corridors;
(c) The presence of historic properties, sacred sites, and other high value cultural resources, giving preference to lands that would not impair the cultural significance of such resources;
(d) The presence of recreation and other important uses or resources, giving preference to lands that would not impair the value of such uses or resources; and
(e) The potential for oil and gas development, giving preference to lands with high potential for development.
Legislative history
This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.