Iowa Code § 633A.6308
Nonjudicial settlement agreements
Iowa · Iowa Code Chapter 633A — Iowa Trust Code · Status: effective
Cite this
- Citation
- Iowa Code § 633A.6308, Nonjudicial settlement agreements, Iowa, version 1 as recorded 2026-10-03, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/2278401
- Permanent ID
ys:prov:2278401@1- SHA-256
00966493b952b19046fc95610e8882fef651c31f9d905af311829af352954d54
The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.
Full text
1. For purposes of this part, “interested persons” means persons whose consent would be required in order to achieve a binding settlement were the settlement to be approved by the court.
2. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 3, or as to a modification or termination of a trust under section 633A.2203, interested persons may enter into a binding nonjudicial settlement agreement with respect to any matter involving a trust.
3. A nonjudicial settlement is valid only to the extent the settlement does not violate a material purpose of the trust and includes terms and conditions that could be properly approved by the court under this trust code or other applicable law.
4. Matters that may be resolved by a nonjudicial settlement agreement include any of the following:
a. The interpretation or construction of the terms of the trust.
b. The approval of a trustee’s report or accounting.
c. Direction to a trustee to refrain from performing a particular act or the grant to a trustee of any necessary or desirable power.
d. The resignation or appointment of a trustee and the determination of a trustee’s compensation.
e. The transfer of a trust’s principal place of administration.
f. The liability of a trustee for an action relating to the trust.
5. Any interested person may request the court to approve a nonjudicial settlement agreement, to determine whether the representation provided was adequate, and to determine whether the agreement contains terms and conditions the court could have properly approved.