Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-2.5-906
Admissibility of evidence - legislative declaration - definitions
Colorado · Colorado Revised Statutes Title 19 — Children's Code · Status: effective
Cite this
- Citation
- Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-2.5-906, Admissibility of evidence - legislative declaration - definitions, Colorado, version 1 as recorded 2026-10-03, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/2297327
- Permanent ID
ys:prov:2297327@1- SHA-256
7885552cb6170689a5f3ca6a7a23b0469b5d51aefbb1acda5e3012d8a39bc607
The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.
Full text
(1) It is the intent of the general assembly that, when evidence is sought to be excluded from the trier of fact in a delinquency proceeding because of the conduct of a peace officer leading to its discovery, such evidence should not be suppressed if otherwise admissible when the proponent of the evidence can show that the conduct in question was taken in a reasonable, good-faith belief that it was proper. It is further declared to be the general assembly's intent to identify the characteristics of admissible evidence and not to address or attempt to prescribe court procedure.
(2) For purposes of this section:
(a) "Good-faith mistake" means a reasonable error of judgment concerning the existence of facts or law that, if true, would be sufficient to constitute probable cause.
(b) "Peace officer" has the meaning set forth in section 16-2.5-101.
(c) "Technical violation" means a reasonable, good-faith reliance upon a statute that is later ruled unconstitutional, a warrant that is later invalidated due to a good-faith mistake, or a court precedent that is later overruled.
(3) The court shall not suppress evidence sought to be excluded in a delinquency proceeding because of the conduct of the peace officer leading to its discovery if the court finds that the evidence was seized by the peace officer as a result of a good-faith mistake or a technical violation and the evidence is otherwise admissible.
(4) The court shall not supress in a delinquency proceeding evidence that is obtained as a result of a confession voluntarily made in a noncustodial setting if the evidence is otherwise admissible.
(5) It is prima facie evidence that the conduct of the peace officer was taken in the reasonable good-faith belief that it was proper if there is a showing that the evidence was obtained pursuant to and within the scope of a warrant, unless the warrant was obtained through intentional and material misrepresentation.