yourstate.us
Haw. Rev. Stat. § 291E-40

Judicial review; procedure

Hawaii · Hawaii Revised Statutes Chapter 291E — Use of Intoxicants While Operating a Vehicle · Status: effective

Get this as JSONEmbed this
Cite this
Citation
Haw. Rev. Stat. § 291E-40, Judicial review; procedure, Hawaii, version 1 as recorded 2026-10-03, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/2419273
Permanent ID
ys:prov:2419273@1
SHA-256
ce8b2087738af6299f545ec184631e4b781674ff31f9776f31cc17803e096b09

The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.

Full text

(a) If the director sustains the administrative revocation after an administrative hearing, the respondent, or parent or guardian of a respondent under the age of eighteen, may file a petition for judicial review within thirty days after the administrative hearing decision is mailed. The petition shall be filed with the clerk of the district court in the district in which the incident occurred and shall be accompanied by the required filing fee for civil actions. The filing of the petition shall not operate as a stay of the administrative revocation, nor shall the court stay the administrative revocation pending the outcome of the judicial review. The petition shall be appropriately captioned. The petition shall state with specificity the grounds upon which the petitioner seeks reversal of the administrative revocation. (b) The court shall schedule the judicial review as quickly as practicable, and the review shall be on the record of the administrative hearing without taking of additional testimony or evidence. If the petitioner fails to appear without just cause or, in the case of a petitioner under the age of eighteen, the petitioner fails to appear with a parent or guardian, the court shall affirm the administrative revocation. (c) The sole issues before the court shall be whether the director: (1) Exceeded constitutional or statutory authority; (2) Erroneously interpreted the law; (3) Acted in an arbitrary or capricious manner; (4) Committed an abuse of discretion; or (5) Made a determination that was unsupported by the evidence in the record. (d) The court shall not remand the matter back to the director for further proceedings consistent with its order.