yourstate.us
48 CFR 215.404-71-1

215.404-71-1 General.

United States · 48 CFR — Federal Acquisition Regulations System · Status: effective

Get this as JSONEmbed this
Cite this
Citation
48 CFR 215.404-71-1, 215.404-71-1 General, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/243143
Permanent ID
ys:prov:243143@1
SHA-256
ddfc077b44472066564601239423420c2eae1047a4627d42990aa576007815e0

The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.

Full text

(a) The weighted guidelines method focuses on four profit factors— (1) Performance risk; (2) Contract type risk; (3) Facilities capital employed; and (4) Cost efficiency. (b) The contracting officer assigns values to each profit factor; the value multiplied by the base results in the profit objective for that factor. Except for the cost efficiency special factor, each profit factor has a normal value and a designated range of values. The normal value is representative of average conditions on the prospective contract when compared to all goods and services acquired by DoD. The designated range provides values based on above normal or below normal conditions. In the price negotiation documentation, the contracting officer need not explain assignment of the normal value, but should address conditions that justify assignment of other than the normal value. The cost efficiency special factor has no normal value. The contracting officer shall exercise sound business judgment in selecting a value when this special factor is used (see 215.404-71-5).

Legislative history

This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.