yourstate.us
48 CFR 916.405-2

916.405-2 Cost-plus-award-fee contracts.

United States · 48 CFR — Federal Acquisition Regulations System · Status: effective

Get this as JSONEmbed this
Cite this
Citation
48 CFR 916.405-2, 916.405-2 Cost-plus-award-fee contracts, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/247973
Permanent ID
ys:prov:247973@1
SHA-256
e9cb5a5ccae0fa12bad0dc5a1741e783bca935f6b3b63d0b3ad5b7ac1006df28

The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.

Full text

(d) Fee determination plans. Award fee arrangements limited to technical performance considerations are prohibited because they may increase cost disproportionately to any benefits gained. Instead, the award fee arrangement shall include both technical performance (including scheduling as appropriate) and business management considerations tailored to the needs of the particular situation. In addition, in a situation where cost estimating reliability and other factors are such that the negotiation of a separate predetermined incentive sharing arrangement applicable to cost performance is determined both feasible and advantageous, cost incentives may be added. The resulting contract would then be identified as a cost-plus-incentive-fee/award-fee combination type. The goals and evaluation criteria should be results-oriented. The award fee should be concentrated on the end product of the contract, that is, output, be it hardware, research and development, demonstration or services, together with business management considerations. However, input criteria such as equal employment opportunity, small business programs, functional management areas, such as safety, security, etc., should not be disregarded and may be appropriate criteria upon which to base some part of the award fee. Specific goals or objectives shall be established in relation to each performance evaluation criterion against which contractor performance is measured.

Legislative history

This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.