49 CFR 192.945
§ 192.945 What methods must an operator use to measure program effectiveness?
United States · 49 CFR — Transportation · Status: effective
Cite this
- Citation
- 49 CFR 192.945, § 192.945 What methods must an operator use to measure program effectiveness?, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/257281
- Permanent ID
ys:prov:257281@1- SHA-256
2af50ec7929eba03981a4b30a61caedb20f73e23e702edfac23fb3518c390d12
The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.
Full text
(a) General. An operator must include in its integrity management program methods to measure whether the program is effective in assessing and evaluating the integrity of each covered pipeline segment and in protecting the high consequence areas. These measures must include the four overall performance measures specified in ASME/ANSI B31.8S (incorporated by reference, see § 192.7 of this part), section 9.4, and the specific measures for each identified threat specified in ASME/ANSI B31.8S, Appendix A. An operator must submit the four overall performance measures as part of the annual report required by § 191.17 of this subchapter.
(b) External Corrosion Direct assessment. In addition to the general requirements for performance measures in paragraph (a) of this section, an operator using direct assessment to assess the external corrosion threat must define and monitor measures to determine the effectiveness of the ECDA process. These measures must meet the requirements of § 192.925.
Legislative history
This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.