yourstate.us
7 CFR 3400.15

§ 3400.15 Review criteria.

United States · 7 CFR — Agriculture · Status: effective

Get this as JSONEmbed this
Cite this
Citation
7 CFR 3400.15, § 3400.15 Review criteria, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/29809
Permanent ID
ys:prov:29809@1
SHA-256
fca8e5b33d7b6ea085e6d17208eda0ba8ae99dcfcc308b929b14f04ce310891d

The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.

Full text

(a) Subject to the varying conditions and needs of States, Federal funded agricultural research supported under these provisions shall be designed to, among other things, accomplish one or more of the following purposes: (1) Continue to satisfy human food and fiber needs; (2) Enhance the long-term viability and competitiveness of the food production and agricultural system of the United States within the global economy; (3) Expand economic opportunities in rural America and enhance the quality of life for farmers, rural citizens, and society as a whole; (4) Improve the productivity of the American agricultural system and develop new agricultural crops and new uses for agricultural commodities; (5) Develop information and systems to enhance the environment and the natural resource base upon which a sustainable agricultural economy depends; or (6) Enhance human health. In carrying out its review under § 3400.14, the peer review group will use the following form upon which the evaluation criteria to be used are enumerated, unless pursuant to § 3400.5(a), different evaluation criteria are specified in the annual solicitation of proposals for a particular program. Proposal falls within guidelines? __________ Yes __________ No. If no, explain why proposal does not meet guidelines under comment section of this form. (b) Proposals satisfactorily meeting the guidelines will be evaluated and scored by the peer review panel for each criterion utilizing a scale of 1 through 10. A score of one (1) will be considered low and a score of ten (10) will be considered high for each selection criterion. A weighted factor is used for each criterion.

Legislative history

This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.