yourstate.us
7 CFR 3430.35

§ 3430.35 Review of noncompetitive applications.

United States · 7 CFR — Agriculture · Status: effective

Get this as JSONEmbed this
Cite this
Citation
7 CFR 3430.35, § 3430.35 Review of noncompetitive applications, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/30021
Permanent ID
ys:prov:30021@1
SHA-256
f90958e3ad9b2189c388105b9090e8d1fb54f3e31d895d4407453fa97c1e9c7b

The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.

Full text

(a) General. Some projects are directed by either authorizing legislation and/or appropriations to specifically support a designated institution or set of institutions for particular research, education, or extension topics of importance to the nation, a State, or a region. Although these projects may be awarded noncompetitively, these projects or activities are subject to the same application process, award terms and conditions, Federal assistance laws and regulations, reporting and monitoring requirements, and post-award administration and closeout policies and procedures as competitive Federal assistance programs. The only difference is these applications are not subject to a competitive peer or merit review process at the Agency level. (b) Requirements. All noncompetitive applications recommended for funding are required to be reviewed by the program officer and, as required, other Departmental and NIFA officials; and the review documented by the NIFA program officer. For awards recommended for funding at or greater than $10,000, an independent review and a unit review by program officials are required.

Legislative history

This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.