yourstate.us
9 CFR 205.214

§ 205.214 Litigation as to whether a system is operating in compliance with the Section.

United States · 9 CFR — Animals and Animal Products · Status: effective

Get this as JSONEmbed this
Cite this
Citation
9 CFR 205.214, § 205.214 Litigation as to whether a system is operating in compliance with the Section, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/34492
Permanent ID
ys:prov:34492@1
SHA-256
64dd3782c84815d67ba5784ca2be75f8205f7d9caad9586ab8f80f894a1722a6

The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.

Full text

(a) The requirements for a system in subsection (c) are written as the definition of the term “central filing system,” so that failure of a system to meet any such requirement, either at the time of its establishment or later, will mean that it is not a “central filing system” as defined. (b) The issue whether a system, after certification, is operating in compliance, thus whether it is a “central filing system” as defined, could be litigated and ruled on in a case involving only private parties, such as a lender and a buyer of a farm product. The only immediate effect of a finding in such a case, that a system is not a “central filing system” as defined, would be that the rights of the secured party in the case would be as if the State had no system. However, others would be in doubt as to whether they could safely rely on the same system.

Legislative history

This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.