50 CFR 80.68
§ 80.68 Must a State fish and wildlife agency allocate funds between marine and freshwater fisheries projects?
United States · 50 CFR — Wildlife and Fisheries · Status: effective
Cite this
- Citation
- 50 CFR 80.68, § 80.68 Must a State fish and wildlife agency allocate funds between marine and freshwater fisheries projects?, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/419350
- Permanent ID
ys:prov:419350@1- SHA-256
53fea5113e4cf41802306b11fb128e0d0521d1ac6b74123055bb269db22a3951
The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.
Full text
Yes. Each coastal State's fish and wildlife agency must equitably allocate the funds apportioned under the Sport Fish Restoration Act between projects with benefits for marine fisheries and projects with benefits for freshwater fisheries.
(a) The subprograms authorized by the Sport Fish Restoration Act do not have to allocate funding in the same manner if the State fish and wildlife agency allocates Sport Fish Restoration funds equitably between marine and freshwater fisheries.
(b) The coastal States for purposes of this allocation are:
(1) Alabama, Alaska, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, and Washington;
(2) The Commonwealths of Puerto Rico and the Northern Mariana Islands; and
(3) The Territories of Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and American Samoa.
Legislative history
This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.