12 CFR — Banks and Banking
Appendix B to Subpart A of Part 327—Conversion of Scorecard Measures into Score
United States · 12 CFR — Banks and Banking · Status: effective
Cite this
- Citation
- 12 CFR — Banks and Banking, Appendix B to Subpart A of Part 327—Conversion of Scorecard Measures into Score, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/46542
- Permanent ID
ys:prov:46542@1- SHA-256
1c815785c0006e1b0388ad15c22bdc2ad35d468e29cecfd40c8e88dfa12d8fee
The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.
Full text
Weighted average CAMELS ratings between 1 and 3.5 are assigned a score between 25 and 100 according to the following equation:
where:
For certain scorecard measures, a lower ratio implies lower risk and a higher ratio implies higher risk. These measures include:
• Concentration measure;
• Credit quality measure;
• Market risk measure;
• Average short-term funding to average total assets ratio; and
• Potential losses to total domestic deposits ratio (loss severity measure).
For those measures, a value between the minimum and maximum cutoff values is converted linearly to a score between 0 and 100, according to the following formula:
For other scorecard measures, a lower value represents higher risk and a higher value represents lower risk. These measures include:
• Leverage ratio;
• Core earnings to average quarter-end total assets ratio;
• Core deposits to total liabilities ratio; and
• Balance sheet liquidity ratio.
For those measures, a value between the minimum and maximum cutoff values is converted linearly to a score between 0 and 100, according to the following formula:
Legislative history
This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.