yourstate.us
12 CFR 404.32

§ 404.32 Factors General Counsel may consider in determining whether to authorize testimony and/or the production of records.

United States · 12 CFR — Banks and Banking · Status: effective

Get this as JSONEmbed this
Cite this
Citation
12 CFR 404.32, § 404.32 Factors General Counsel may consider in determining whether to authorize testimony and/or the production of records, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/47357
Permanent ID
ys:prov:47357@1
SHA-256
eab5a46597cb75452be4586f442e3615a8c17dbaa4c9ae62f9dc28ef38901a90

The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.

Full text

In determining whether to authorize Ex-Im Bank personnel to provide testimony and/or produce records regarding information acquired in the course of their performance of official duties, or due to their official status, the General Counsel may consider factors including, but not limited to, the following: (a) Efficiency—the conservation of the time and resources of Ex-Im Bank personnel for the conduct of official business; (b) Undue burden—whether the demand creates an undue burden upon Ex-Im Bank or is otherwise inappropriate under any applicable administrative or court rules; (c) Appearance of bias—whether the testimony and/or production of records could result in the public perception that Ex-Im Bank is favoring one party over another, or advocating the position of a party to the proceeding; (d) Furtherance of agency policy—whether the testimony and/or production of records is consistent with the policy and mission of the Ex-Im Bank; (e) Prevention of fraud or injustice—whether the disclosure of the information requested is necessary to prevent the perpetration of fraud or injustice; (f) Relevance to litigation—whether the testimony and/or production of records sought is relevant to the subject litigation; (g) Necessity—whether the testimony and/or production of records, including a release of such in camera, is appropriate or necessary as determined by either the procedural rules governing the legal proceeding, or according to the relevant laws concerning privilege; (h) Availability from another source—whether the information sought through testimony or production of records is available from another source; (i) Violations of laws or regulations—whether the testimony and/or production of records would violate a statute, regulation, executive order, or other official directive; (j) Classified information—whether the testimony and/or production of records would improperly reveal information classified pursuant to applicable statute or Executive Order; and (k) Compromise of rights and interests—whether the testimony and/or production of records would compromise any of the following: law enforcement interests, constitutional rights, national security interests, foreign policy interests, or the confidentiality of commercial and/or financial information.

Legislative history

This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.