14 CFR 152.319
§ 152.319 Monitoring and reporting of program performance.
United States · 14 CFR — Aeronautics and Space · Status: effective
Cite this
- Citation
- 14 CFR 152.319, § 152.319 Monitoring and reporting of program performance, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/57910
- Permanent ID
ys:prov:57910@1- SHA-256
471ad436ff7cfb5526359660c4f8def5d0850be57eada21f4140a867a8ed9ab3
The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.
Full text
(a) The sponsor or planning agency shall monitor performance under the project to ensure that—
(1) Time schedules are being met;
(2) Work units projected by time periods are being accomplished; and,
(3) Other performance goals are being achieved.
(b) Reviews shall be made for—
(1) Each item of development or work element included in the project; and
(2) All other work to be performed as a condition of the grant agreement.
(c) Airport development. Unless otherwise requested by the Administrator, the sponsor of a project for airport development shall submit a performance report, on an annual basis, that must include—
(1) A comparison of actual accomplishments to the goals established for the period, made, if applicable, on a quantitative basis related to cost data for computation of unit costs;
(2) The reasons for slippage in each case where an established goal was not met; and
(3) Other pertinent information including, when appropriate, an analysis and explanation of each cost overrun and high unit cost.
(d) Airport planning. The sponsor of a project for airport master planning or a planning agency conducting a project for airport system planning shall submit a performance report, on a quarterly basis, that must include:
(1) A comparison of actual accomplishments to the goals established for the period, made, if applicable, on a quantitative basis related to costs for computation of work element costs;
(2) Reasons for slippage in each case where an established goal was not met; and
(3) Other pertinent information including, when appropriate, an analysis and explanation of each cost overrun and high work element cost.
Legislative history
This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.