yourstate.us
2 CFR 180.630

§ 180.630 May a Federal agency impute the conduct of one person to another?

United States · 2 CFR — Federal Financial Assistance · Status: effective

Get this as JSONEmbed this
Cite this
Citation
2 CFR 180.630, § 180.630 May a Federal agency impute the conduct of one person to another?, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/586
Permanent ID
ys:prov:586@1
SHA-256
28daafb921e638b1696202f28571dbd39215d25bfdb20ca407a5318172a17102

The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.

Full text

For purposes of actions taken under this part, a Federal agency may impute conduct as follows: (a) Conduct imputed from an individual to an organization. A Federal agency may impute the fraudulent, criminal, or other improper conduct of any officer, director, shareholder, partner, employee, or other individual associated with an organization to that organization when the improper conduct occurred in connection with the individual's performance of duties for or on behalf of that organization, or with the organization's knowledge, approval or acquiescence. The organization's acceptance of the benefits derived from the conduct is evidence of knowledge, approval, or acquiescence. (b) Conduct imputed from an organization to an individual or between individuals. A Federal agency may impute the fraudulent, criminal, or other improper conduct of any organization to an individual, or from one individual to another individual, if the individual to whom the improper conduct is imputed either participated in, had knowledge of, or reason to know of the improper conduct. (c) Conduct imputed from one organization to another organization. A Federal agency may impute the fraudulent, criminal, or other improper conduct of one organization to another organization when the improper conduct occurred in connection with a partnership, joint venture, joint application, association, corporation, company, or similar arrangement or with the organization's knowledge, approval, or acquiescence, or when the organization to whom the improper conduct is imputed has the power to direct, manage, control or influence the activities of the organization responsible for the improper conduct. Acceptance of the benefits derived from the conduct is evidence of knowledge, approval, or acquiescence.

Legislative history

This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.