yourstate.us
Tex. Agriculture Code § 203.053

CRITERIA FOR ACCEPTING AND PRIORITIZING WATER SUPPLY ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS

Texas · Texas Agriculture Code · Status: effective

Get this as JSONEmbed this
Cite this
Citation
Tex. Agriculture Code § 203.053, CRITERIA FOR ACCEPTING AND PRIORITIZING WATER SUPPLY ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS, Texas, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/628667
Permanent ID
ys:prov:628667@1
SHA-256
22ea042451043d5a8ca56a0a9acdd74a0928b28078c4921474ece5735191b739

The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.

Full text

(a) The board shall adopt rules establishing: (1) criteria for accepting project proposals; and (2) a system to prioritize projects for each funding cycle, giving priority to projects that balance the most critical water conservation need and the highest projected water yield. (b) The criteria required by Subsection (a)(1) must include a requirement that each proposal state the projected water yield of the proposed project, as modeled by a person with expertise in hydrology, water resources, or another technical area pertinent to the evaluation of water supply. (c) The board shall consult with stakeholders, including hydrologists and representatives from soil and water conservation districts, to develop by rule standard methods of reporting the projected water yield under Subsection (b). (d) In prioritizing projects under Subsection (a)(2), the board shall consider: (1) the need for conservation of water resources within the territory of the project, based on the state water plan adopted under Section 16.051, Water Code; (2) projected water yield of areas of the project, based on soil, slope, land use, types and distribution of trees, brush, and other vegetative matter, and proximity of trees, brush, and other vegetative matter to rivers, streams, and channels; (3) any method the project may use to control brush; (4) cost-sharing contract rates within the territory of the project; (5) the location and size of the project; (6) the budget of the project and any associated requests for grant funds submitted under this title; (7) the implementation schedule of the project; and (8) the administrative capacities of the board and the entity that will manage the project. (e) In prioritizing projects under Subsection (a)(2), the board may consider: (1) scientific research on the effects of brush removal on water supply; and (2) any other criteria that the board considers relevant to assure that the water supply enhancement program can be most effectively, efficiently, and economically implemented.