yourstate.us
16 CFR 1061.9

§ 1061.9 Information about the effect on interstate commerce.

United States · 16 CFR — Commercial Practices · Status: effective

Get this as JSONEmbed this
Cite this
Citation
16 CFR 1061.9, § 1061.9 Information about the effect on interstate commerce, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/65190
Permanent ID
ys:prov:65190@1
SHA-256
2dd499692e3c49c3111b0a389947b731121adb2566b09e3dac3572e819f6772b

The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.

Full text

An application for exemption from preemption shall provide information on the effect on interstate commerce a granting of the requested exemption would be expected to cause, including the extent of the burden and the benefit to public health and safety that would be provided by the State or local requirement. More specifically, applications for exemption shall include, where available, information showing: (a) That it is technologically feasible to comply with the State or local requirement. Evidence of technological feasibility could take the form of: (1) Statements by affected persons indicating ability to comply with the State or local government requirement. (2) Statements indicating that other jurisdictions have established similar requirements that have been, or could be, met by persons affected by the requirement that is the subject of the application. (3) Information as to technological product or process modifications necessary to achieve compliance with the State or local requirement. (4) Any other information indicating the technological feasibility of compliance with the State or local requirement. (b) That it is economically feasible to comply with the State or local requirement, i.e., that there would not be significant adverse effects on the production and distribution of the regulated products. Evidence of economic feasibility could take the form of: (1) Information showing that the State or local requirement would not result in the unavailability (or result in a significant decline in the availability) of the product, either in the interstate market or within the geographic boundary of the State or local government imposing the requirement. (2) Statements from persons likely to be affected by the State or local requirement concerning the anticipated effect of the requirement on the availability or continued marketing of the product. (3) Any other information indicating the economic impact of compliance with the State or local requirement, such as projections of the anticipated effect of the State or local requirement on the sales and prices of the product, both in interstate commerce and within the geographic area of the State or local government. (c) The present geographic distribution of the product to which the State or local requirement would apply, and projections of future geographic distribution. Evidence of the geographic distribution could take the form of governmental or private information or data (including statements from manufacturers, distributors, or retailers of the product) showing advertising in the interstate market, interstate retailing, or interstate distribution. (d) The probability of other States or local governments applying for an exemption for a similar requirement. Evidence of the probability that other States or local governments would apply for an exemption could take the form of statements from other States or local governments indicating their intentions. (e) That specified local conditions require the State or local government to apply with the exemption in order to adequately protect the public health or safety of the State or local area.

Legislative history

This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.