17 CFR 201.400
§ 201.400 Interlocutory review.
United States · 17 CFR — Commodity and Securities Exchanges · Status: effective
Cite this
- Citation
- 17 CFR 201.400, § 201.400 Interlocutory review, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/68107
- Permanent ID
ys:prov:68107@1- SHA-256
5a1e017228f95b8636ae3cb21ba47673b82f2a8d2812bb24bf9cbd3470a084b4
The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.
Full text
(a) Availability. The Commission may, at any time, on its own motion, direct that any matter be submitted to it for review. Petitions by parties for interlocutory review are disfavored, and the Commission ordinarily will grant a petition to review a hearing officer ruling prior to its consideration of an initial decision only in extraordinary circumstances. The Commission may decline to consider a ruling certified by a hearing officer pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section or the petition of a party who has been denied certification if it determines that interlocutory review is not warranted or appropriate under the circumstances. This section is the exclusive remedy for review of a hearing officer's ruling prior to Commission consideration of the entire proceeding and is the sole mechanism for appeal of actions delegated pursuant to §§ 200.30-9 and 200.30-10 of this chapter.
(b) Expedited consideration. Interlocutory review of a hearing officer's ruling shall be expedited in every way, consistent with the Commission's other responsibilities.
(c) Certification process. A ruling submitted to the Commission for interlocutory review must be certified in writing by the hearing officer and shall specify the material relevant to the ruling involved. The hearing officer shall not certify a ruling unless:
(1) His or her ruling would compel testimony of Commission members, officers or employees or the production of documentary evidence in their custody; or
(2) Upon application by a party, within five days of the hearing officer's ruling, the hearing officer is of the opinion that:
(i) The ruling involves a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion; and
(ii) An immediate review of the order may materially advance the completion of the proceeding.
(d) Proceedings not stayed. The filing of an application for review or the grant of review shall not stay proceedings before the hearing officer unless he or she, or the Commission, shall so order. The Commission will not consider the motion for a stay unless the motion shall have first been made to the hearing officer.
Legislative history
This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.