yourstate.us
18 CFR 1318.301

§ 1318.301 EA preparation.

United States · 18 CFR — Conservation of Power and Water Resources · Status: effective

Get this as JSONEmbed this
Cite this
Citation
18 CFR 1318.301, § 1318.301 EA preparation, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/72745
Permanent ID
ys:prov:72745@1
SHA-256
24215aadcfe4bc81bed0e9fd9de061a90bf7087391b84e6192214506f60c9141

The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.

Full text

(a) The EA will briefly describe the proposed action and include brief discussions of the purpose and need for action, alternatives required by NEPA sec. 102(2)(H), 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(H), and the environmental effects of the proposed action and alternatives. (b) TVA may, in its sole discretion, request public and stakeholder involvement in the preparation of an EA and provide a public comment period. When public comment is requested, the EA will address substantive comments made in accordance with § 1318.500. (c) The EA will briefly provide sufficient data and analysis for determining whether to sign a FONSI or prepare an EIS. (d) The text of an EA is strictly prohibited from exceeding 75 pages, not including citations or appendices. (e) Appendices are to be used for voluminous materials, such as scientific tables, collections of data, statistical calculations, and the like, which substantiate the analysis provided in the EA. Appendices are not to be used to provide additional substantive analysis, because that would circumvent the congressionally mandated page limits. (f) The breadth and depth of analysis in an EA will be tailored to ensure that the environmental analysis does not exceed this page limit. In this regard, as part of the finalization of the EA, a responsible official will certify (and the certification will be incorporated into the EA) that TVA has considered the factors mandated by NEPA; that the EA represents TVA's good-faith effort to prioritize documentation of the most important considerations required by the statute within the congressionally mandated page limits; that this prioritization reflects TVA's expert judgment; and that any considerations addressed briefly or left unaddressed were, in TVA's judgment, comparatively not of a substantive nature that meaningfully informed the consideration of environmental effects and the resulting decision on how to proceed. Such certification may be combined with the certification required under § 1318.106(e).

Legislative history

This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.