yourstate.us
19 CFR 190.53

§ 190.53 Restructuring of claims.

United States · 19 CFR — Customs Duties · Status: effective

Get this as JSONEmbed this
Cite this
Citation
19 CFR 190.53, § 190.53 Restructuring of claims, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/75537
Permanent ID
ys:prov:75537@1
SHA-256
81f7842000da4eea81d7324d16ea722ce568b6ca435a44cada18099701f011c9

The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.

Full text

(a) General. CBP may require claimants to restructure their drawback claims in such a manner as to foster administrative efficiency. In making this determination, CBP will consider the following factors: (1) The number of transactions of the claimant (imports and exports); (2) The value of the claims; (3) The frequency of claims; (4) The product or products being claimed; and (5) For 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) and 1313(b) claims, the provisions, as applicable, of the general manufacturing drawback ruling or the specific manufacturing drawback ruling. (b) Exemption from restructuring; criteria. In order to be exempt from a restructuring, a claimant must demonstrate an inability or impracticability in restructuring its claims as required by CBP and must provide a mutually acceptable alternative. Criteria used in such determination will include a demonstration by the claimant of one or more of the following: (1) Complexities caused by multiple commodities or the applicable general manufacturing drawback ruling or the specific manufacturing drawback ruling; (2) Variable and conflicting manufacturing and inventory periods (for example, financial, accounting and manufacturing records maintained are significantly different); (3) Complexities caused by multiple manufacturing locations; (4) Complexities caused by difficulty in adjusting accounting and inventory records (for example, records maintained—financial or accounting—are significantly different); and/or (5) Complexities caused by significantly different methods of operation.

Legislative history

This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.