19 CFR 191.53
§ 191.53 Restructuring of claims.
United States · 19 CFR — Customs Duties · Status: effective
Cite this
- Citation
- 19 CFR 191.53, § 191.53 Restructuring of claims, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/75668
- Permanent ID
ys:prov:75668@1- SHA-256
c272ab3b9740c883376081f181a4e7630e71c9b22a53fd8b83d318c9ec13ae41
The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.
Full text
(a) General. Customs may require claimants to restructure their drawback claims in such a manner as to foster Customs administrative efficiency. In making this determination, Customs will consider the following factors:
(1) The number of transactions of the claimant (imports and exports);
(2) The value of the claims;
(3) The frequency of claims;
(4) The product or products being claimed; and
(5) For 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) and 1313(b) claims, the provisions, as applicable, of the general manufacturing drawback ruling or the specific manufacturing drawback ruling.
(b) Exemption from restructuring; criteria. In order to be exempt from a restructuring, a claimant must demonstrate an inability or impracticability in restructuring its claims as required by Customs and must provide a mutually acceptable alternative. Criteria used in such determination will include a demonstration by the claimant of one or more of the following:
(1) Complexities caused by multiple commodities or the applicable general manufacturing drawback ruling or the specific manufacturing drawback ruling;
(2) Variable and conflicting manufacturing and inventory periods (for example, financial, accounting and manufacturing records maintained are significantly different);
(3) Complexities caused by multiple manufacturing locations;
(4) Complexities caused by difficulty in adjusting accounting and inventory records (for example, records maintained—financial or accounting—are significantly different); and/or
(5) Complexities caused by significantly different methods of operation.
Legislative history
This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.