yourstate.us
20 CFR 30.222

§ 30.222 How does a claimant establish that the employee has been diagnosed with chronic silicosis or has sustained a consequential injury, illness, impairment or disease?

United States · 20 CFR — Employees' Benefits · Status: effective

Get this as JSONEmbed this
Cite this
Citation
20 CFR 30.222, § 30.222 How does a claimant establish that the employee has been diagnosed with chronic silicosis or has sustained a consequential injury, illness, impairment or disease?, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/76728
Permanent ID
ys:prov:76728@1
SHA-256
1fdc8754d0bc2ed23011db2ac3aaae783a68115a89ded6f126d07487ec9f8e6e

The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.

Full text

(a) A written diagnosis of the employee's chronic silicosis (as defined in § 30.5(k)) shall be made by a licensed physician and accompanied by one of the following: (1) A chest radiograph, interpreted by an individual certified by NIOSH as a B reader, classifying the existence of pneumoconioses of category 1/0 or higher; or (2) Results from a computer assisted tomograph or other imaging technique that are consistent with silicosis; or (3) Lung biopsy findings consistent with silicosis. (b) An injury, illness, impairment or disease sustained as a consequence of accepted chronic silicosis covered by the provisions of § 30.220(a) must be established with a fully rationalized medical report by a physician that shows the relationship between the injury, illness, impairment or disease and the accepted chronic silicosis. Neither the fact that the injury, illness, impairment or disease manifests itself after a diagnosis of accepted chronic silicosis, nor the belief of the claimant that the injury, illness, impairment or disease was caused by the accepted chronic silicosis, is sufficient in itself to prove a causal relationship.

Legislative history

This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.