yourstate.us
20 CFR 30.619

§ 30.619 Do all the parties to this type of tort suit have to take these actions?

United States · 20 CFR — Employees' Benefits · Status: effective

Get this as JSONEmbed this
Cite this
Citation
20 CFR 30.619, § 30.619 Do all the parties to this type of tort suit have to take these actions?, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/76807
Permanent ID
ys:prov:76807@1
SHA-256
6a3ffccc7826e920bcd2e962796e510b47e37d62e5fdb48ee8635ae85b70136d

The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.

Full text

The type of tort suits described in § 30.615 may be filed by more than one individual, each with a different cause of action. For example, a tort suit may be filed against a beryllium vendor by both a covered Part B employee and his or her spouse, with the covered Part B employee claiming for chronic beryllium disease and the spouse claiming for loss of consortium due to the covered Part B employee's exposure to beryllium. However, since the spouse of a living covered Part B employee could not be an eligible surviving beneficiary under Part B of EEOICPA, the spouse would not have to comply with the termination requirements of §§ 30.616 through 30.618. A similar result would occur if a tort suit were filed by both the spouse of a deceased covered Part B employee and other family members (such as children of the deceased covered part B employee). In this case, the spouse would be the only eligible surviving beneficiary of the deceased covered Part B employee under Part B of the EEOICPA because the other family members could not be eligible for benefits while he or she was alive. As a result, the spouse would be the only party to the tort suit who would have to comply with the termination requirements of §§ 30.616 through 30.618.

Legislative history

This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.