20 CFR 30.907
§ 30.907 Can an impairment evaluation obtained by OWCP be challenged prior to issuance of the recommended decision?
United States · 20 CFR — Employees' Benefits · Status: effective
Cite this
- Citation
- 20 CFR 30.907, § 30.907 Can an impairment evaluation obtained by OWCP be challenged prior to issuance of the recommended decision?, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/76855
- Permanent ID
ys:prov:76855@1- SHA-256
53fac2f5a6dbd6ce590639c2f200efb579b425c06ff7f3607cca6f6f28b8b0ed
The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.
Full text
(a) An employee may submit arguments challenging an impairment evaluation, and/or additional medical evidence of impairment, before the district office issues a recommended decision on his or her claim. However, the district office will not consider an additional impairment evaluation, even if it differs from the impairment evaluation obtained under § 30.905 or § 30.906, if it does not meet the criteria listed in § 30.905(b)(1), (2) and (3).
(b) If the district office obtains an additional impairment evaluation that differs from the impairment evaluation obtained under § 30.905 or § 30.906, the district office will base its recommended determinations regarding impairment upon the evidence it considers to have the greatest probative value, after evaluating all relevant evidence of impairment in the record, including evidence from directed impairment evaluations and referee impairment evaluations, if any, that it deems necessary pursuant to §§ 30.410 and 30.411 of this part.
Legislative history
This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.