yourstate.us
Cal. Business and Professions Code § 5096.21

Cal. Business and Professions Code § 5096.21

California · California Business and Professions Code · Status: effective · Effective 2026-01-01

Get this as JSONEmbed this
Cite this
Citation
Cal. Business and Professions Code § 5096.21, California, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-25, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/773592
Permanent ID
ys:prov:773592@1
SHA-256
e9b9e38b2da0b1d478250e6bbe291f3723f955b000a6c2890d05c8722b8e15d5

The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.

Full text

(a) (1) If the board determines, through a majority vote of the board at a regularly scheduled meeting, that allowing individuals from a particular state to practice in this state pursuant to a practice privilege as described in Section 5096, violates the board’s duty to protect the public, pursuant to Section 5000.1, the board shall require out-of-state individuals licensed from that state, as a condition to exercising a practice privilege in this state, to file the notification form and pay the applicable fees as required by Section 5096.22. (2) A state for which the board has made a determination pursuant to paragraph (1) to require individuals licensed from that state to file a notification form and pay the applicable fees may subsequently be redetermined by the board, by majority vote of the board at a regularly scheduled meeting, to allow individuals from that state to practice in this state pursuant to a practice privilege as described in Section 5096. (b) The board shall, at minimum, consider the following factors when making a determination or redetermination pursuant to subdivision (a): (1) Whether the state timely and adequately addresses enforcement referrals made by the board to the accountancy regulatory board of that state, or otherwise fails to respond to requests the board deems necessary to meet its obligations under this article. (2) Whether the state makes the disciplinary history of its licensees publicly available through the internet in a manner that allows the board to adequately link consumers to an internet website to obtain information. (3) Whether the state imposes discipline against licensees that is appropriate in light of the nature of the alleged misconduct. (4) Whether the state has in place and is operating pursuant to enforcement practices substantially equivalent to the current best practices guidelines adopted by the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy provided those guidelines have been determined by the board to meet or exceed the board’s own enforcement practices. (5) Whether the state has in place and implements comparable licensure requirements.