20 CFR 402.140
§ 402.140 The FOIA Exemption 6: Clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
United States · 20 CFR — Employees' Benefits · Status: effective
Cite this
- Citation
- 20 CFR 402.140, § 402.140 The FOIA Exemption 6: Clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, United States, version 1 as recorded 2026-07-09, yourstate.us, https://yourstate.us/provision/78109
- Permanent ID
ys:prov:78109@1- SHA-256
8a23da5aa9d6005cf8fdbfd046d5ba3a57a50bf2eb42b0c1ecc9eb8713fccb5c
The hash is SHA-256 of this version's text, with every run of whitespace collapsed to a single space and the ends trimmed. The ID always leads back here, and checking it says whether the text you cited is still the current version.
Full text
We may withhold records about individuals if disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of their personal privacy.
(a) Balancing test. When we decide whether to release records that contain personal or private information about someone else, we weigh the foreseeable harm of invading a person's privacy against the public interest in disclosure. When we determine whether disclosure would be in the public interest, we will consider whether disclosure of the requested information would shed light on how a Government agency performs its statutory duties.
(b) Agency employees. To protect the safety of agency employees, we will not disclose information when the information sought is contact information and/or duty stations of one or more Federal employees if the disclosure would place employee(s) at risk of injury or other harm.
(c) Examples. We generally withhold the personally identifiable information of individuals if we do not have the consent (consistent with § 401.100 of this chapter) of the number holder, including but not limited to the number holder's home address, age, Social Security number, claims file, and other personal information. If the information requested concerns agency employees, we will determine disclosure on a case-by-case basis. For example, our redaction of management officials' information may be treated differently depending on how the balancing test applies in a given circumstance.
Legislative history
This is a federal regulation, adopted through agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act — not enacted by a recorded vote of Congress.